Subaru Forester 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 171 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 251 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 13 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 6 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 488 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1577 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Subaru Forester uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 43 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`058 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |