Subaru Forester 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Forester engine produces 82 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 152 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 490 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.72 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 23 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru Forester has 81 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Subaru Forester uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Subaru Forester has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Toyota RAV4, so Subaru Forester quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |