Subaru Forester 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Forester engine produces 90 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Mazda CX-5. Thanks to more power Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Forester consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 6 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage capacity. Subaru Forester has 42 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |