Subaru Forester 2013 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 198 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Forester engine produces 30 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 8.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
1090 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
730 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
Subaru Forester is 17 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1510 litres | |
Subaru Forester has more luggage capacity. Subaru Forester has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 2`220 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | high | |
Volkswagen Tiguan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Subaru Forester has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volkswagen Tiguan, so Volkswagen Tiguan quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 16 800 | 10 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |