Subaru Forester 2024 vs Toyota RAV4 2025
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Subaru Forester) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Toyota RAV4) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 241 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 6 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 8 NM more than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km + 21.4 kWh/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 15.30 € | 18.50 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | no data | |
| 880 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 221 mm (8.7 inches) | 191 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Forester can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 1 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 779 litres | 949 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2107 litres | 1801 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Subaru Forester uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Forester (by 306 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`508 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 000 | 43 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |