Subaru Forester 2024 vs Honda CR-V 2022
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Subaru Forester) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Honda CR-V) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 241 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 35 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 54 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 14.60 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 221 mm (8.7 inches) | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Forester can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller, but higher. Subaru Forester is 5 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 779 litres | 1113 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2107 litres | 2166 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Subaru Forester has 334 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 59 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 000 | 39 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |