Subaru Forester 2016 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 16 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo XC60. Despite less power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.3 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Forester consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller, but slightly higher. Subaru Forester is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1557 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`080 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |