Subaru Forester 2016 vs Nissan X-Trail 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Forester engine produces 30 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Forester can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1557 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 320 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`080 kg | 2`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`562 kg | 1`540 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 518 kg | 810 kg | |
| Subaru Forester load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 56 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |