Subaru Forester 2016 vs Subaru Forester 2013

 
Subaru Forester
2016 - 2018
Subaru Forester
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 147 HP147 HP
Torque: 350 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds10.2 seconds
Subaru Forester 2016 and Subaru Forester 2013 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Subaru Forester 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.15.7
Subaru Forester 2016 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester 2013, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1170 km in combined cycle1050 km in combined cycle
1110 km on highway1220 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.61 m4.60 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.74 m1.74 m
Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester 2016 is 2 cm longer than the Subaru Forester 2013, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 505 litres505 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1557 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Subaru Forester 2016 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester 2013, which means Subaru Forester 2016 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`080 kg2`080 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 11 40010 000
Pros and Cons:
    Subaru Forester has
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv