Subaru Forester 2016 vs Jeep Cherokee 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 195 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Forester engine produces 48 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.6 | |
| Subaru Forester consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Forester can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller, but higher. Subaru Forester is 3 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 448 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1557 litres | 1555 litres | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Jeep Cherokee may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Forester (by 2 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`080 kg | 2`494 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |