Subaru Forester 2018 vs Toyota RAV4 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 206 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Forester engine produces 1 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 10 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Forester can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.69 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 3 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1779 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Subaru Forester uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`223 kg | 2`120 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`655 kg | 1`675 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 568 kg | 445 kg | |
| Subaru Forester load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem more than Toyota RAV4. Therefore, Subaru Forester is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 23 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |