Subaru Forester 2018 vs Subaru Outback 2017

 
Subaru Forester
2018 - 2021
Subaru Outback
2017 - 2019
Body: Crossover / SUVEstate car / wagon
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP175 HP
Torque: 196 NM235 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds10.2 seconds
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving.
Subaru Forester engine produces 25 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.27.7
Real fuel consumption: 8.2 l/100km8.6 l/100km
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Subaru Forester consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 870 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway950 km on highway
760 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 220 mm (8.7 inches)200 mm (7.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Forester can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 16 years16 years
Engine spread: Used also on Subaru XVInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Outback might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.82 m
Width: 1.82 m1.84 m
Height: 1.73 m1.68 m
Subaru Forester is smaller, but higher.
Subaru Forester is 20 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 505 litres512 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1779 litres1848 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.2 metres less than that of the Subaru Outback.
Gross weight: 2`223 kg2`100 kg
Net weight:1`655 kg1`592 kg
Load capacity:568 kg508 kg
Subaru Forester load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Subaru Outback. Therefore, Subaru Forester is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
The Subaru Outback scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 17 00015 200
Pros and Cons: Subaru Forester has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Subaru Outback has
  • more power
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv