Subaru Forester 2018 vs Jeep Cherokee 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 270 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 120 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 204 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Subaru Forester and Jeep Cherokee are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 448 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1779 litres | 1555 litres | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage capacity. Subaru Forester has 57 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Forester (by 224 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.8 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`223 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru Forester scores higher in safety tests, but Jeep Cherokee is better rated in child safety tests. The Subaru Forester scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |