Subaru Forester 2018 vs Honda CR-V 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 243 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 40 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 47 NM less than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Subaru XV | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 4 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1110 litres | |
| Subaru Forester has 8 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`223 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru Forester scores higher in safety tests, but Honda CR-V is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 200 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |