Subaru Forester 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Forester engine produces 13 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Subaru Forester engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Subaru XV | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Forester is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Subaru Forester has 45 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`223 | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 26 200 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |