Subaru Forester 2018 vs Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Forester engine produces 90 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery Sport, whereas torque is 144 NM less than Land Rover Discovery Sport. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery Sport, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery Sport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Subaru Forester engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Subaru XV | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery Sport, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`223 | 1`744 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru Forester scores higher in safety tests, but Land Rover Discovery Sport is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Discovery Sport scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
| |