Subaru Forester 2016 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 171 HP | 167 HP | |
Torque: | 235 NM | 222 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
Subaru Forester is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Forester engine produces 4 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.7 | |
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Forester consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Outback, Subaru Legacy | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.61 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
Subaru Forester is smaller, but higher. Subaru Forester is 9 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Forester is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 477 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1640 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 2`210 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 13 400 | 16 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |