Subaru Forester 2016 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 241 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Forester engine produces 1 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller, but slightly higher. Subaru Forester is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |