Subaru Forester 2016 vs Subaru Forester 2013

 
Subaru Forester
2016 - 2018
Subaru Forester
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 241 HP150 HP
Torque: 350 NM198 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.5 seconds11.8 seconds
Subaru Forester 2016 is more dynamic to drive.
Subaru Forester 2016 engine produces 91 HP more power than Subaru Forester 2013, whereas torque is 152 NM more than Subaru Forester 2013. Thanks to more power Subaru Forester 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.56.5
Real fuel consumption: 11.0 l/100km8.2 l/100km
The Subaru Forester 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Subaru Forester 2016 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester 2013, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester 2016 could require 300 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester 2016 consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester 2013.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle920 km in combined cycle
850 km on highway1090 km on highway
540 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Subaru Forester 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.60 m4.60 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.74 m1.74 m
Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester 2016 and Subaru Forester 2013 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: no data505 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`1102`015
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 13 40016 800
Pros and Cons: Subaru Forester has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Subaru Forester has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv