Subaru Forester 2016 vs Subaru Forester 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 241 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 198 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Subaru Forester 2016 is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Forester 2016 engine produces 91 HP more power than Subaru Forester 2013, whereas torque is 152 NM more than Subaru Forester 2013. Thanks to more power Subaru Forester 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 6.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
The Subaru Forester 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester 2016 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester 2013, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester 2016 could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester 2016 consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester 2013. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
540 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Subaru Forester 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.60 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester 2016 and Subaru Forester 2013 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 505 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`015 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 13 400 | 16 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |