Subaru Forester 2016 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 241 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Forester engine produces 91 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 142 NM more than Mazda CX-5. Thanks to more power Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Forester consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 4 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |