Subaru Forester 2016 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Subaru Forester) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Jeep Cherokee) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Forester engine produces 20 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 152 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Subaru XV | Used also on Jeep Renegade | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller, but higher. Subaru Forester is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 412 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 2`475 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |