Subaru Forester 2016 vs Audi Q5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Forester engine produces 95 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 152 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Subaru Forester consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller, but higher. Subaru Forester is 2 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 2`490 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |