Subaru Forester 2016 vs Subaru Forester 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Subaru Forester 2016 and Subaru Forester 2013 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Subaru Forester 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester 2016 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester 2013, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester 2016 could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester 2016 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester 2013. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Subaru XV | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy, Subaru XV | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester 2013 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester 2016 is 2 cm longer than the Subaru Forester 2013, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 505 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |