Subaru Forester 1997 vs Subaru Forester 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 170 HP | 125 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 - 240 NM | 184 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12.4 seconds | 6.3 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.5 | 8.5 - 11.0 | |
|
Subaru Forester 1997 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.58 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester 1997 and Subaru Forester 2002 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 406 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester 1997 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester 2002. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`650 | ~ 1`844 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |