Subaru Forester 1997 vs Honda CR-V 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 170 HP | 128 - 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 - 240 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12.4 seconds | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.5 | 9.7 - 10.2 | |
|
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller. Subaru Forester is 8 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`650 | ~ 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |