Subaru Forester 1997 vs Honda HR-V 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Subaru Forester is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Honda HR-V is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Subaru Forester is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda HR-V can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Honda HR-V also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 | 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 - 170 HP | 105 - 124 HP | |
Torque: | 184 - 240 NM | 135 - 144 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12.4 seconds | 10.8 - 11.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.5 | 8.2 - 8.6 | |
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda HR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.01 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.59 m | 1.58 m | |
Subaru Forester is larger. Subaru Forester is 44 cm longer than the Honda HR-V, 4 cm wider, while the height of Subaru Forester is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 285 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.3 metres more than that of the Honda HR-V. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`650 | ~ 1`640 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |