Subaru Forester 2000 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 3.2 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 170 HP | 165 - 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 - 240 NM | 318 - 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12 seconds | 10.6 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.5 | 9.5 - 14.2 | |
|
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller. Subaru Forester is 35 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 27 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`650 | ~ 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |