Subaru Forester 2000 vs Honda CR-V 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Subaru Forester
2000 - 2002
Honda CR-V
1997 - 2002
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.02.0

Performance

Power: 125 - 170 HP128 - 147 HP
Torque: 184 - 240 NM182 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 - 12 seconds10.5 - 12.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.0 - 10.59.7 - 10.2
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.45 m4.53 m
Width: 1.74 m1.75 m
Height: 1.59 m1.68 m
Subaru Forester is smaller.
Subaru Forester is 8 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 406 litres375 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1525 litres670 litres
Subaru Forester has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Forester (by 855 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V.
Gross weight: ~ 1`905 kg~ 1`900 kg
Net weight:~ 1`443 kg~ 1`470 kg
Load capacity:~ 462 kg~ 430 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 22001400
Pros and Cons: Subaru Forester has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Honda CR-V has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv