Subaru Forester 2000 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Subaru Forester is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Space Star can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 170 HP | 71 - 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 - 240 NM | 88 - 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12 seconds | 11.7 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.5 | 4.1 - 4.2 | |
|
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 5.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Star. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is larger. Subaru Forester is 66 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 8 cm wider, while the height of Subaru Forester is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 912 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Subaru Forester can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`650 | ~ 1`333 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |