Subaru Forester 2002 vs Honda CR-V 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 230 HP | 140 - 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 - 320 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 13.4 seconds | 10.6 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 11.0 | 6.7 - 10.1 | |
|
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller. Subaru Forester is 16 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Subaru Forester has 121 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`844 | ~ 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |