Subaru Forester 2002 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Subaru Forester is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 - 230 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
Torque: | 184 - 320 NM | 192 - 314 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 13.4 seconds | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 11.0 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.58 m | 1.70 m | |
Subaru Forester is smaller. Subaru Forester is 6 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 410 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
Subaru Forester has 4 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`844 | ~ 2`009 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | average | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |