Subaru Forester 2002 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Subaru Forester
2002 - 2005
Mitsubishi Outlander
2001 - 2006
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Subaru Forester is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Outlander can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi Outlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.52.0 - 2.4

Performance

Power: 125 - 230 HP136 - 201 HP
Torque: 184 - 320 NM176 - 303 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.3 - 13.4 seconds7.7 - 12.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.5 - 11.09.1 - 10.1
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.45 m4.54 m
Width: 1.74 m1.75 m
Height: 1.58 m1.62 m
Subaru Forester is smaller.
Subaru Forester is 9 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 406 litres402 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1705 litres
Subaru Forester has 4 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`844~ 2`041
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 26001800
Pros and Cons: Subaru Forester has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Mitsubishi Outlander has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv