Subaru Forester 2008 vs BMW X3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 230 HP | 143 - 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 - 350 NM | 200 - 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 - 12.7 seconds | 6.6 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 11.0 | 6.2 - 10.0 | |
|
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW X3. On average, Subaru Forester equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller, but slightly higher. Subaru Forester is 1 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
|
BMW X3 has more luggage space. Subaru Forester has 30 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`016 | ~ 2`289 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
BMW X3 has
| |