Subaru Forester 2011 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru Forester is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 263 HP | 150 - 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 - 350 NM | 233 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 12.4 seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 10.5 | 6.4 - 9.6 | |
|
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Subaru Forester equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 603 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1773 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Subaru Forester has 153 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`027 | ~ 2`146 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |