Subaru Forester 2011 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru Forester is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Outlander can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi Outlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 263 HP | 121 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 - 350 NM | 190 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 12.4 seconds | 8.7 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 10.5 | 1.9 - 8.9 | |
|
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. On average, Subaru Forester equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller, but slightly higher. Subaru Forester is 10 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 771 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1792 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Subaru Forester has 321 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`027 | ~ 2`159 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru Forester is better rated in child safety tests. The Mitsubishi Outlander scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |