Subaru Forester 2011 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru Forester is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-5 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-5 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 263 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 - 350 NM | 210 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 12.4 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 10.5 | 4.6 - 7.3 | |
|
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. On average, Subaru Forester equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 2 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru Forester has 55 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. This could mean that the Subaru Forester uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`027 | ~ 2`045 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |