Subaru Forester 2013 vs Subaru Forester 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 240 HP | 147 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 - 350 NM | 196 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 11.8 seconds | 6 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.5 | 6.3 - 11.0 | |
|
Subaru Forester 2013 petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester 2008. On average, Subaru Forester 2013 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester 2008. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester 2013 is 4 cm longer than the Subaru Forester 2008, 2 cm wider, while the height of Subaru Forester 2013 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Subaru Forester 2013 has more luggage capacity. Subaru Forester 2013 has 55 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester 2008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester 2013 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Subaru Forester 2008, which means Subaru Forester 2013 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`055 | ~ 2`016 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 3600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |