Subaru Forester 2018 vs Jeep Cherokee 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru Forester is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Cherokee can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 185 HP | 180 - 271 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 - 238 NM | 234 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 10.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 8.2 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Subaru Forester and Jeep Cherokee are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 1401 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Subaru Forester has 896 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`223 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru Forester scores higher in safety tests, but Jeep Cherokee is better rated in child safety tests. The Subaru Forester scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 600 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |