Subaru Forester 2018 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subaru Forester is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-5 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru Forester is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-5 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-5 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 185 HP | 155 - 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 - 238 NM | 196 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 10.3 seconds | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 8.2 | 5.8 - 7.2 | |
|
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 8 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Subaru Forester has 1 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`223 | ~ 2`085 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru Forester scores higher in safety tests, but Mazda CX-5 is better rated in child safety tests. The Subaru Forester scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 200 | 27 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |