Subaru Forester 2016 vs Toyota RAV4 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru Forester is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota RAV4 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota RAV4 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 241 HP | 146 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 - 350 NM | 187 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 11.8 seconds | 8.3 - 11.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 8.5 | 5.0 - 8.6 | |
|
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller, but slightly higher. Subaru Forester and Toyota RAV4 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1087 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2078 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`039 | ~ 2`128 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |