Subaru Forester 2016 vs Subaru Forester 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 241 HP | 147 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 - 350 NM | 198 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 11.8 seconds | 7.5 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 8.5 | 5.7 - 8.5 | |
|
Subaru Forester 2016 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester 2013. On average, a Subaru Forester 2016 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Subaru Forester 2013. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester 2016 is 1 cm longer than the Subaru Forester 2013, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1564 litres | 1577 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester 2016 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester 2013, which means Subaru Forester 2016 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`056 kg | ~ 2`055 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`591 kg | ~ 1`524 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 465 kg | ~ 531 kg | |
| Subaru Forester 2016 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Subaru Forester 2013. Therefore, Subaru Forester 2013 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Subaru Forester has
| |