Subaru Forester 2016 vs Subaru Forester 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 241 HP | 147 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 - 350 NM | 198 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 11.8 seconds | 7.5 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 8.5 | 5.7 - 8.5 | |
|
Subaru Forester 2016 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester 2013. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester 2016 is 1 cm longer than the Subaru Forester 2013, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 505 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`039 | ~ 2`055 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |