Smart ForTwo 2010 vs Smart ForTwo 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 0.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 61 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Smart ForTwo 2010 is more dynamic to drive. Smart ForTwo 2010 engine produces 10 HP more power than Smart ForTwo 2004, but torque is 3 NM less than Smart ForTwo 2004. Thanks to more power Smart ForTwo 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Smart ForTwo 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Smart ForTwo 2010 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForTwo 2004, which means that by driving the Smart ForTwo 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Smart ForTwo 2010 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForTwo 2004. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 33 litres | 33 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Smart ForTwo 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.70 m | 2.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.56 m | 1.52 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Smart ForTwo 2010 is larger, but slightly lower. Smart ForTwo 2010 is 20 cm longer than the Smart ForTwo 2004, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 8.8 meters | 8.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo 2010 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Smart ForTwo 2004. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`020 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Smart ForTwo 2010 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Smart ForTwo 2004 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Smart ForTwo 2010, so Smart ForTwo 2010 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForTwo has
|
Smart ForTwo has
| |