Smart ForTwo 2010 vs Audi TT 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Smart ForTwo engine produces 89 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 158 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Smart ForTwo reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Smart ForTwo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Smart ForTwo consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Smart ForTwo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Smart ForTwo consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 33 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Smart ForTwo) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.70 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.56 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Smart ForTwo is smaller, but higher. Smart ForTwo is 149 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 28 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForTwo is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 292 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Smart ForTwo has 72 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 8.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo is 2.1 metres less than that of the Audi TT, which means Smart ForTwo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`020 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Smart ForTwo has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForTwo has
|
Audi TT has
| |