Smart ForTwo 2010 vs Smart ForTwo 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 0.8 Diesel | 0.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 54 HP | 41 HP | |
Torque: | 130 NM | 100 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 19.8 seconds | |
Smart ForTwo 2010 is more dynamic to drive. Smart ForTwo 2010 engine produces 13 HP more power than Smart ForTwo 2004, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Smart ForTwo 2004. Thanks to more power Smart ForTwo 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 3.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 33 litres | 22 litres | |
680 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 2.70 m | 2.50 m | |
Width: | 1.56 m | 1.52 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.55 m | |
Smart ForTwo 2010 is larger. Smart ForTwo 2010 is 20 cm longer than the Smart ForTwo 2004, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 8.8 meters | 8.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo 2010 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Smart ForTwo 2004. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`050 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | Smart ForTwo 2010 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Smart ForTwo 2004 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Smart ForTwo 2010, so Smart ForTwo 2010 quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 4600 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForTwo has
|
Smart ForTwo has
| |