Smart ForTwo 2012 vs Audi A2 2000
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Smart ForTwo is more dynamic to drive. Smart ForTwo engine produces 27 HP more power than Audi A2, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Audi A2. Thanks to more power Smart ForTwo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Smart ForTwo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2, which means that by driving the Smart ForTwo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Smart ForTwo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 33 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 470 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A2) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Smart ForTwo) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A2 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Skoda Fabia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi A2 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Audi A2 2000 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Audi A2 2000 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.70 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.56 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Smart ForTwo is smaller, but slightly higher. Smart ForTwo is 114 cm shorter than the Audi A2, 11 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1085 litres | |
|
Audi A2 has more luggage space. Smart ForTwo has 170 litres less trunk space than the Audi A2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 8.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo is 1.5 metres less than that of the Audi A2, which means Smart ForTwo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`050 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Smart ForTwo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A2 has serious deffects in 245 percent more cases than Smart ForTwo, so Smart ForTwo quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForTwo has
|
Audi A2 has
| |