Smart ForTwo 2012 vs Ford Mustang 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 71 HP | 309 HP | |
Torque: | 92 NM | 407 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Smart ForTwo engine produces 238 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 315 NM less than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 33 litres | 59 litres | |
560 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 2.70 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.56 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.57 m | 1.38 m | |
Smart ForTwo is smaller, but higher. Smart ForTwo is 209 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 36 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForTwo is 18 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 408 litres | |
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Smart ForTwo has 188 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
Turning diameter: | 8.8 meters | 12.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo is 3.4 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang, which means Smart ForTwo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`020 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7600 | 27 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForTwo has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |