Smart ForTwo 2012 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 328 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 NM | 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is a more dynamic driving. Smart ForTwo engine produces 257 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 285 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Due to the lower power, Smart ForTwo reaches 100 km/h speed 7.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 10.9 | |
|
The Smart ForTwo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Smart ForTwo consumes 6.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Smart ForTwo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 990 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.70 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.56 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Smart ForTwo is smaller, but higher. Smart ForTwo is 214 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 36 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForTwo is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage space. Smart ForTwo has 144 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 8.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`020 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForTwo has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |