Smart ForTwo 2012 vs Audi TT 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Smart ForTwo engine produces 159 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 278 NM less than Audi TT. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 33 litres | 50 litres | |
| 560 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Smart ForTwo) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.70 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.56 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Smart ForTwo is smaller, but higher. Smart ForTwo is 148 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 27 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForTwo is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 305 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Smart ForTwo has 85 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 8.8 meters | 10.96 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo is 2.16 metres less than that of the Audi TT, which means Smart ForTwo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`020 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Smart ForTwo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForTwo has
|
Audi TT has
| |