Smart ForTwo 2012 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 0.8 Diesel | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Aygo is a more dynamic driving. Smart ForTwo engine produces 14 HP less power than Toyota Aygo, but torque is 37 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Due to the lower power, Smart ForTwo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 3.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 33 litres | 35 litres | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Aygo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Smart ForTwo) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.70 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.56 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Smart ForTwo is smaller, but higher. Smart ForTwo is 72 cm shorter than the Toyota Aygo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForTwo is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 751 litres | |
|
Smart ForTwo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Smart ForTwo has 81 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The Toyota Aygo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 8.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Smart ForTwo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`050 | 1`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Smart ForTwo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 380 percent more cases than Smart ForTwo, so Smart ForTwo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForTwo has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |