Smart ForTwo 2004 vs Honda Jazz 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Smart ForTwo is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Honda Jazz has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Smart ForTwo is available with rear wheel drive, while Honda Jazz can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 0.6 - 0.8 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 41 - 75 HP | 78 - 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 80 - 110 NM | 110 - 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 - 19.8 seconds | 12.9 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 5.3 | 5.5 - 5.8 | |
|
Smart ForTwo petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.50 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.52 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Smart ForTwo is smaller, but slightly higher. Smart ForTwo is 134 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForTwo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1323 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 8.7 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo is 1.1 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Smart ForTwo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`465 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForTwo has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |